1. Recruiter 2. Manager (Team culture round) 3. Home assignment A recorded interview with the recruiter, which I wasn't informed earlier and I've never seen recruiter recording a video of initial screening. HM round was easy and it was more of a chat which was good. The next round was home assignment and the feedback was utterly useless. My code and tests did the very thing they said was missing, which was seriously confusing. I was told we would have a discussion with the team after I submit my code and that round will also consists of system design. Once again in last 2 years Wolt has shown their interview process is broken and won't improve. And this role had on-call rotation, which was not clearly mentioned in initial screening by recruiter. Overall, just poor experience and I would recommend staying away from them because they try to waste candidate's time with utterly useless feedback and don't tell what one should do to improve. Save your time people :)

Two interviewers. One with the camera off. An hour and a half of questions about the most challenging project. I'll say it again: an hour and a half! Not 45 minutes, but 90! Oh well. I shared a true story about how I launched a project for a serious company from the very beginning, from the very beginning, all the way to production. I was lucky to be involved, and I told them about it. The result: rejection. Who are they looking for?! An engineering director for a programmer role? Good luck.