Lengthy process and met with four people. They passed me around like a hot potato for weeks. My suggestion is a better upfront screening followed by a panel interview. It will cut down on the duration of the process and make it better for the hiring team and candidates.

Typical interview where they asked me about my experience. There was an emphasis on Agile. The interview started off well but 20 mins in, I could see my interviewer struggled to keep his eyes open. A couple of bobble heads later and repeating the same question that was just asked, it was safe to assume he fell asleep. I knew little about this company (they found me) so I wanted to know more about what to expect working there and that's when the interview went from bad to worst. I asked the person how he would describe the culture. "Multicultural" was the response. I was baffled. I then asked what he liked most about working at Tramore and he says he loves project management. I said yes but what makes Tramore special? He says it's their unique process, no details, nothing. I believe an interview goes both ways, employer wants to make sure the candidate is qualified for the job but also employer needs to convince the candidate that the company is a good place to make a career. Falling asleep at the interview and not offering any information is disrespectful. I haven't heard back from Tramore but not only would I not want to work there, if presented the opportunity, I wouldn't do business with them.