J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Revolut (Londres, Angleterre) en janv. 2020
Entretien
Interview had multiple steps, the first was general introductory interview where both candidates and the company ask and answer questions from each other. Once you pass the first round, there will be technical exercise which they will ask the candidate to complete in a week. Once the exercise is completed, the second stages of interview which includes presenting the result of exercise, questions regarding the exercise (mainly line of thinking), and live coding.
I failed the interview because of not finishing the live coding exercise in time, however it was only because the interviewer's comments were misleading (this is my biased opinion but I would recommend them to not disturb the interviewee during such intense and stressful segment of interview) and at the end she just said your time is up.
too long process. many steps. strange livecoding where after an optimal solution they ask you about another optimal solution. A little annoying ML interview where you have to solve basic theory of probability tasks for senior position
Rapid-fire format — interviewer moved through topics quickly, frequently interrupting to redirect when answers got too long or off-track. Several questions were skipped due to time pressure or when the candidate struggled to formulate a clear answer
What I appreciated most was the transparency. The recruiters kept me updated at every stage, and the interviewers were clearly experts in their fields. They didn't just look for the "right" answer but were interested in my thought process and how I handle edge cases in data. The technical discussions were intellectually stimulating rather than intimidating.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Discussion of past projects, deepdive on specifics
