J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Meta (Mountain View, CA) en nov. 2017
Entretien
Recruiter reached out via email asking if I was interested in their Product Growth team. Followed-up asking to schedule a call for the following week. First asked if I'd be open to moving north from Los Angeles.
Went over what the role looked like at Facebook for their four-person growth team, that it would eventually move into a Product Management role. Answered some product specific questions focused on features, engagement, and product metrics to determine logical approaches to testing and launching a product. Asked about SQL, and if I was comfortable taking an assessment that I agreed to.
Received an email at the end of the week stating they had moved on to other candidates but failed to provide feedback after making the initial reach out, whereas other companies do.
The interview was fast, took about 2-weeks, and only had issues with the quality of the call - my guess it was AirPods.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Describe a feature you'd launch and how you would analyze the success of the product.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Meta (Menlo Park, CA)
Entretien
A round of SQL and product question. The SQL question was pretty simple, and I explained my thought process. Product question was tricky and open ended. Don't expect feedback for the interview.
Recruiter screen, first round, then 5 interview full loop. Recruiter for full loop felt cold and unresponsive while I was doing the interview. Interviewers would change what they were looking for halfway through the questions and didn't seem to pay attention to my answers (I would propose a solution, they would try to get me to another solution, and then they revealed at the end the first solution I said.)
J'ai postulé via un recruteur. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez Meta (Menlo Park, CA) en août 2025
Entretien
1. Recruiter reached out through linkedin
2. Technical interview SQL + Case study.
I believe the interviewer was looking for more metrics but I couldn't provide. It was overall a good learning.
