I met on site with one individual. The in-person interview went well, the environment was attractive, and the conversation was good. Then, they had me complete an at-home "challenge" which consisted of two questions. One was a competitor evaluation, and the other was a sales prospectus for a segment of the market. They expected written responses and a PowerPoint presentation to be given on site. One of the two questions took over 20 hours to complete, as it required research and careful evaluation in order to provide a competent answer. I requested that I be judged on this question alone, and there was no flexibility at all on their side -- I was basically told that I would only be invited back if I answered both questions. This was a sign that they were using my pro bono research to fuel their business decisionmaking, which while not illegal, is demoralizing and disrespectful to the candidates, who are *unemployed* and need to spend their time wisely in order to find gainful employment. I suspected it at this point, but was not sure it was actually happening. When I followed up to ask when my next interview would be, I was told that several of the Senior Product Manager roles were eliminated and that their hiring priorities shifted. Within one week, I see new Senior Product Manager positions popping up on their website, and several of them remaining. I contact the recruiter to ask them to reconcile my observation with what they told me, and receive no answer about it in response. As far as I'm concerned, Medallia is engaging in immoral business practices and does not deserve to hire talent. INTERVIEWEE BEWARE -- Your time might be wasted here, and you are better off looking elsewhere!!!