My interviewers were amiable and it was clear they had a good working relationship, which was nice to experience and made me want to be a part of their team. The interview questions were standard and vague and allowed me to respond authentically. Having researched the company's approach to diversity, equity and inclusion, I noticed that only within the past few years has Instructure outwardly communicated standard commitments to these workplace, culture and policy necessities. In 2016, the company published internal figures that broke down data on gender, race and tech-oriented (e.g. software programming) and non-tech-oriented (e.g. support) roles, and it was clear they understood how dominantly white male the organization was. In 2019, the company provided an update on internal discussions on policy, as well as a reaffirmation of their commitments. I could not find any statement from the summer of 2020 onward to reaffirm their solidarity with their black employees. In the interview, I asked about the progress they've made on progress the institution made on commitments from 2016 and the response was muddled and lacking concrete examples of changes that have been made despite them having been at the company since that time. While I cannot be sure given this was the final interaction I had during the interview process, a lack of coherence across employees about what they've done to combat racism as an institution signaled a lack of priority at a day-to-day level in the work they do, which is likely overshadowed by urgency and other white dominant cultural norms. I removed myself from the interview process after the interview so none of this is firsthand (thus "no opinion" on the overall experience and the "no offer" indicated), yet hopefully this account helps you think about your own upcoming interview and what you value in your place of employment.