1st round was general aptitude/wonderlic test. Followed by technical round. Technical round was very easy, I am 9 years of experience and it felt like I m interviewing as a 2~3 years experience candidate. All of the question were bookish and straightforward. Even while writing code i used return type as constant & passing params as reference hoping the interviewer will go deep and ask why pass as reference & why return type const? She asked about polymorphism, as I've experienced working in C++, Java & game development, so I explained her how it affects and makes code more scalable & flexible in real time projects (Now i think she was looking for more like bookish answer) Asked abt Pointer Increment, again i answered correctly. She asked me to write code for string reversal using pointers, at first I wrote wrong code (due to nervousness), she told me to take ur time, and then i wrote again, a perfect working code (as mentioned in ans).. still she asked me whether it's correct or not I checked it again with all the boundary & termination condition and confirmed confidently that its correct. Finally she told me that i my basics are fine but she was not sure that i've good code writing skills. Nothing she asked anything from my resume & projects I've done which loudly mentions my DS, Algo, Architectural & Problem solving skills. I would advise the HR that they should have the technical team to go through the profile of the candidate thoroughly before shortlisting them and avoid wasting candidate's time. Acc. To the interview it felt like they are looking for 2~3 years of exp. I was hoping it to be a complex interview but it was very easy and irony is that they didn't shortlist me even after giving 99% correct answers.

Tell me about projects questions on C++ basic one copy constructor, move constructor. overloading, virtual function questions on cloud private and public cloud difference between delete and truncate SaaS, More questions on cloud Second Round : Managerial related to projects and experience