The interview was really easy. It was quick as well from application to interview. The questions were easy. There was no question I couldn't answer. The two people who interviewed me made me feel really relaxed it was more like a conversation than an interview but they seem really inexperienced with interviews, they had no clue about the job description that was advertised. It was advertised as an out of hours role when the phone lines closes at 5pm and most times you will be working in the evenings. At the same time they said to be available between 8am- 10pm. This is really misleading and unprofessional. This is what I also wanted to clarify at the interview suddenly it became an issue during the interview. Obviously because the interviewers had no clue on what they were doing or they didn't read the job description properly before the interview. The interviewer started asking me if I was looking for a part-time role. No I wasn't, I know it was full time but I wanted to clarify how it was going to work out as it did not seem to match what was advertised. Obviously they already have an internal candidate for the role but wanted to interview others just to follow company's protocol. What a waste of time. Please be sincere don't mislead candidates.

To those who can't be bothered to read it all, here is the conclusion: If you can: avoid "Discovery Days"! Try and get a classic, "normal style" interview. I took part in a "Discovery Day" which contained an interview. Let's go bit by bit: I applied for the job then I was pretty much immediately given information on where to go and when. Excellent! I arrived at 9:10 (the Tram went way faster than expected). Signed in, sat down. No problem! Listed start time: 9:30; actual start time: 9:45 Listed end time: 11:30; actual end time: 11:15 Not great... If the full time was utilised it would've been better I think. Here's how the "Discovery Day" went: We were taken to a room, in the room a lovely person gave us information about the role, E.ON Next, their career journey and what would be happening during the rest of the day. Cool. After this, some of us were called individually by different people to take SHORT interviews. I've capitalised SHORT because they were exceptionally quick, in a bad way. It felt very rushed. I was only asked 4 questions and one of them was just a quirky joke question. If all they needed was those 4 questions that's great - but when I wanted to ask questions I was only allowed to ask one before being called back into the original room, I was cut off! That sucked. I pushed back a bit, but no - "gotta keep the flow unfortunately". That 15 minute late start and 15 minute early finish could've been put into making interviews longer if needed in my opinion! I later begun asking the questions I had in the group setting rather than the 2:1 interview setting, but again was cut off because "we must finish now". Cool...? At that point I didn't care to fight it, just figured I'll email the questions later. When I went back into the room, we completed a group activity that was a bit nebulous and seemingly just a way to waste time while others were being interviewed. Whatever, it was fine. Then we got a very weird tour around the offices, very little was actually shown in terms of what we might be using and where we might be working, we were basically just shown where people eat and then where a free drinks fridge was and that was it. Tour over. The man giving the tour was not very easy to hear either, you had to be very close to him which was difficult when there's 14 of us! Also, in these group type things you can never really know who is going to be there. There were two very annoying men in the group. Not much to be done about that, but it informs my conclusion stated in the beginning.