Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      AppNexus

      Fait partie de Xandr

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur AppNexus | Offres d’emploi chez AppNexus | Salaires chez AppNexus | Avantages sociaux chez AppNexus
      Entretiens chez AppNexusEntretiens d’embauche pour Analyst, Engineering Quality chez AppNexusEntretien chez AppNexus


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Meilleures entreprises pour « Rémunération et avantages » près de chez vous

      avatar
      Intel Corporation
      3.7★Rémunération et avantages
      avatar
      Apple
      4.2★Rémunération et avantages
      avatar
      Lenovo
      3.8★Rémunération et avantages
      avatar
      Honeywell
      4.0★Rémunération et avantages

      Entretien pour Analyst, Engineering Quality

      28 avr. 2015
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience négative

      Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Analyst, Engineering Quality chez AppNexus

      Entretien pour Quality Engineering Analyst

      21 avr. 2015
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience neutre
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 jours. J'ai passé un entretien chez AppNexus

      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez AppNexus en avr. 2015

      Entretien

      Friday afternoon 4 pm, a simple talk for an hour. Two newly hired employees talked with me, but only one spoke. And, one of them was different from what I had been told in email. They asked whether I talked with HR. I said no. So she asked how much do you know about AppNeuxs, I tell I reviewed the website and talked about it. I missed something because the different platforms have different functionalities that I could not connect well. What are you doing now in the position? I tell what I do. Tell me a project you are excited about. Tell me something about one of your projects. This took much time because they tried to build a situation in which users are willing to use it. Based on the project, how would you test it? (This is so big question but suitable for any case, I used 3 rounds to narrow down what they were trying to get from me. And they said they did not care about the UI. But how can that be? My project was supposed to be a mobile one, why cannot I test the output in different screen. What if the output is so annoying? And stopped by this, I was not easily guided to the track they want on user cases. There are so many cases I can create based on what I did. I just focused on the text label to create many. If I did not give a big picture of the test, I admitted it. But I never get hint of that. And at 5 pm, I was interrupted again, which was reasonable.) Then What would you see yourself in 5 years? I said something like dive in testing, know more about development cycle, know the things behind the test and find the reasons, understand the great efficiency of the product in AppNexus. When I knew they do not code I thought this is even better because this looks like what I do right now. And then I explained a lot trying to build the connection to the position. They did not know what I am talking about and no more desire to know it. Even though I show all I get, I never saw the question in their minds that "is this a right person". I asked them what the most challenging part is in their work and how they communicate with other groups and within groups (because I read all reviews here and was curious how they handle this), and whether they are responsible for different groups separately. The answers were clear enough. They were just following the routine and asking the questions that can be asked to anyone, pretty much like yeas ago I had a phone interview by an intern in CBOE. I was the lab mouse again I am afraid. Even I try to connect my current position to their position showing that I can be a good fit because I have this this similarities and apparently they did not get it, continuing questions. If I interview a person, I will let know him know this is serious because he prepared for some time so I need to be responsible for him, and then for my team. From this experience, neither.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Based on the project, how would you test it?
      Répondre à cette question

      Entretien

      I applied online and was contacted by a recruiter for a 60 minute phone interview. I was not sure about what to expect from the interview so I asked if I could speak with the recruiter about it. After the phone call with the recruiter, I was set up for a technical interview with an employee at the same position.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Functional Tests for any app built
      Répondre à cette question

      Entretien pour Quality Engineering Analyst

      6 mai 2015
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Aucune offre
      Expérience positive
      Entretien moyen

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 1 semaine. J'ai passé un entretien chez AppNexus en avr. 2015

      Entretien

      Phone interview included the introduction of the past work, how do you know AppNexus and why you are interested in this position ( This question is repeated in every step of the interview by everyone - you'd better prepare a good strory ), and how to test a specific object ( you need to consider all of possible input scenery ). Onsite included one non-tech warm-up, three tech interviews and one non-tech with Director and the last with HR. The first two tech interviews were similar, they introduced the business model they used and asked how to test it. The third tech interview was also about algorithm and how to test it, code review of a solution. In sum, all of the testing question need you to answer " what's the possible input? " P.S. the next room also had an interview at the same time, it was about Software Engineering. The code on the board was about consumer and producer, a classic problem in multithreading. Comparing with this question, I can't complain my interview was hard.

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Onsite: 1. Testing this model. Seller or Publisher <==> AppNexus Sever <==> Buyers or Bidder The highest bidder wins and he/she only need to pay by the second highest bidding + .01, how to test this policy? ( consider all of the cases the policy may fail, for example, all bidding are same, etc ) 2. Algorithm. Give a set of numbers, check if there is a subset whose summation is equal to a given number. First give the idea of your algorithm and then test it. Second, review a solution to this problem and look for bugs. Different from the class DFS, this solution is divide-and-conquer. For example, check (1, 3, 5 ) -> 6 will be divided to check ( 3, 5 ) -> 5.
      Répondre à cette question