J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Alarm.com (Boston, MA) en janv. 2020
Entretien
A recruiter reached out to me for a phone interview 1.5 months after I submitted my application.
The phone screen consisted of logistical and behavioral questions. The Interviewer started to rush the interview towards the end. The interviewer informed me that I would hear back within a week. The phone screen ended in 15 minutes.
I got a rejection email 5 days after the phone screen.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Willing to relocate? authorized to work in US?
What do you know about the company?
Why did you choose this position?
What is something you learned recently from job/school?
Tell me about one of your most recent projects.
Any questions for the interviewer?
Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Alarm.com en mars 2020
Entretien
Contacted by recruiter, initially set up short phone call (~15 minutes). Did a hackerrank challenge, after that, scheduled a phone interview with the manager (~1 hour). Was told I would hear back from them very soon, and I never heard from them again.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Basic algorithms, questions about hardware and software from a high level. Nothing too specific at the stage I got to.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Alarm.com (Tysons Corner, VA) en oct. 2019
Entretien
ADC (alarm.com) was always very quick to reply and the entire process from application to offer took just under a month. Everyone who interviewed me was kind and courteous -- it was a great experience!
The 'interview' was a 3 stage process:
1) Basic phone screen
2) Online code challenge
3) All day on-site
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Basic screen was a mix of behavioral and high level questions about technical knowledge. This was followed by an online code challenge which was some leetcode easy / medium level questions. Finally, the onsite ran the gamut from hardware to behavioral to software design questions depending on the interviewer.
