employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Food Programme

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Avis sur World Food Programme

4,0

82 % recommanderaient cette entreprise à un proche

(41 avis au total)
avatar

Cindy McCain

61 % approuvent le PDG

Perspective commerciale positive 55 %

World Food Programme a une note de 4,0 étoiles sur 5, basée sur 41 avis sur l’entreprise sur Glassdoor, ce qui indique que l’expérience de travail de la plupart des employés est bonne. Les employés travaillant chez World Food Programme lui ont donné une note qui correspond à la moyenne (écart type maximal de 1) pour les entreprises du secteur ONG et associations à but non lucratif (3,7 étoiles).

Avis par intitulé de poste

41 avis
3,0
22 mai 2026

Salary UNWFP

Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

No advantage for the consultancy non fixed contracts

Inconvénients

No compensation for the consultancy non fixed contracts

4,0
20 avr. 2026

Loved My Work There

Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Working at the World Food Programme offers a unique opportunity to contribute to high-impact work at scale, particularly in complex and fast-evolving contexts. The organization provides strong exposure to international stakeholders, including governments, donors, and media. In a communications role, there is significant room to shape narratives, support advocacy efforts, and work closely with programme and research teams to translate technical data into compelling stories. The work is meaningful, and the sense of purpose is a strong motivator. The role also allows for regional or global exposure, with opportunities to collaborate across multiple countries and teams. In high-performing environments, this can lead to strong professional growth, especially in strategic communications, stakeholder engagement, and crisis management.

Inconvénients

- Internal processes can be slow and highly bureaucratic, which may limit agility and responsiveness, especially in communications where speed is critical. - Decision-making is often layered, and alignment across teams can take time, sometimes affecting clarity of direction and execution. - Workload can be intense, particularly during emergencies or high-visibility moments, with limited resources relative to expectations. - Mobility opportunities can sometimes feel uneven. Staff from Western backgrounds often appear to have greater flexibility or access to international assignments compared to non-Western colleagues. - Strong dominance of English across the organization. While english speaking staff can access opportunities and even advance in non-englih contexts, the same flexibility is not always extended to other languages-speaking staff in Anglophone environments. - Internal processes and procedures are not always applied consistently, particularly where informal networks or relationships influence decision-making.

4,0
7 janv. 2026

Super manager

Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

super manager, overview des actions très intéressant

Inconvénients

c'est une grande institution assez impressionnante

1 - 3 sur 41 avis

Glassdoor compte 1 411 avis de salariés World Food Programme publiés anonymement par des employés World Food Programme. Lisez les avis et évaluations sur Glassdoor, et décidez si World Food Programme est fait pour vous.