Behavioral style with manager, future peer, and key stakeholder. It was conversational mostly, and nothing too unexpected. The gap between rounds was quite long. End to end, it was likley somewhere around 4 months.

The process was fine, involving only a few interviews, but the responsibilities don't align with expectations. This highlights a company trying to merge two roles into one to cut costs. I can only imagine the stress the team experiences under a somewhat rude manager who interrupts during questions. Guiding the interview is essential, but there's a more effective way to approach this—perhaps by incorporating a little kindness or saying, "sorry to interrupt..." The manager appeared rushed and lacked warmth, taking themselves too seriously and displaying low emotional intelligence. Senior leaders should know better. The job description was inadequately communicated, and repeated questions about a preferred qualification that they knew I didn't possess from the very beginning indicated that the interviewers hadn't reviewed my resume, nor do they seem reasonable at discerning the differences between differing levels of responsibility. I expected better consistency and understanding in job descriptions as a basic expectation. I was genuinely interested in working at Visa, and, to be honest, I would likely consider another role there with a different team. I spent a significant amount of time learning about Visa and this role, only to feel disrespected in the end. There's a clear breakdown here.