Stages: 1. Discussion with recruiter on Agile knowledge (not sure what justifies a recruiter asking questions on Agile to a seasoned program manager and scrum master) 2. First actual round on client/project management approach 3. Case Study (candidate needs to prepare a presentation on the solution approach for the problem in the case study) 4. Interview on the basis of Case Study + PM skill interview on scenarios (they call it Tech 1) 5. Interview on the basis of Case Study + PM skill interview on scenarios (they call it Tech 2) 6. Social Justice round 7. HR round -------------------------------------------- Positives: - They explain the process well in the beginning of the interaction - The evaluation process is exhaustive - Their panelists are professional enough to introduce themselves - The presentation is not an elimination round by itself Negatives: - One of the recruiters I dealt with fed conflicting info to me and my friend who had referred me about why there were delays in scheduling further rounds - The Tech 2 round was supposed to be driven on the basis of the case study presentation they had me do. However, despite my polite nudges to discuss the presentation, the interviewers didn't bother with the presentation at all. Neither did they care to mention why they didn't want to discuss the case study at all. Overall, this Tech 2 round, was bad. The panelists not able to drive a meaningful discussion. Their inquiries felt a little raw.

1 online test, 3 technical rounds, social values round, leadership round. I did not clear the last technical round. Could answer all his questions. Need to be really thorough with your skill sets