phone screen/management interview/team interview. all team members must like you and have positive feedback if not they would not move forward with you. overall friendly environment. some team members were quiet, did not have any questions or the most inviting demeanor.
J'ai passé un entretien chez Pearl Law Group (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
The interview consisted of three parts: a writing, logic, and computer skills test, a first round of in-person interviews with different teams, and a second round of in-person interviews.
Each interview was relaxed with general questions about prior immigration experience and knowledge. The questions were more aimed at fit for the company. The overall impression was a company of highly qualified attorneys and staff with a relaxed, employee-centric attitude.
There were two downsides in the interview process:
1) Although the skills test was easy, it left a bad aftertaste and was at odds with the company's image. Competency with basic logic and language skills could be better assessed in the interview, along with more technical questions on immigration.
2) Too many interviewers. At the end of the process, I was not sure who my primary supervisor and coworkers would ultimately be, a critical concern in making a decision to accept employment.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Q: What types of cases have you worked on and what types are you most familiar with?