Only had the first round which was supposed just to be a conversation about my background and motivation for apply. Their questioning overran and I did not get to ask my questions. A major negative is one of the interviewers who was quite young was not properly versed in the technical aspect and challenged my response and was confidently incorrect. At that point, I thought it can't be a good place to work if they expect you to know the landscape but themselves are not technically competent. The other negative is the extolling of their ' outcome-driven' approach as if it was a novel concept. It is not and would be a default in any successful enterprise I was not invited for a second round which they said would have been a case study to see how you think and problem-solving approach.

Video call, talk about relevant work experience, base technical knowledge on the area which could include any of the multiple areas they are interested in like climate, ag, pharmaceuticals or computation; willingness to start a company