Great SME product but not ready for the enterprise market in 2019 - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Veeam Software

3,0
25 févr. 2020
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good product and international folks have high energy

Inconvénients

Dont have technical staff that understand solutions selling in the enterprise and run the business on metric alone measuring every call, every meeting, every email, etc

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Veeam Software

5,0
17 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

solid coworkers good product market fit

Inconvénients

already a very large company?

avatar
Réponse de Veeam Software
5d
Thank you for sharing your experience! We're happy to hear you've connected with great colleagues -building strong teams is something we take seriously. Veeam has grown significantly in the last years, which can take some getting used to, but we work hard to maintain the collaborative spirit. Welcome aboard, and we hope the first year is just the beginning of a great journey here.
2,0
3 févr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Inconvénients

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

6
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout