Masters in Failing - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) PandaDoc

2,0
10 sept. 2023
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

There's some threads of decent humans buried within each team.

Inconvénients

Instead of doing layoffs they're turning every team upside-down, setting targets based on the people they actually want left vs what they have now. They say they're embracing a culture of feedback and coaching, and put half the company on HR documented coaching plans to cover their butts when they fire people instead of doing layoffs. Their business practices are shady, saying “it's a start up” as an excuse for poor leadership, lack of clarity and focus, and basically those who worked during “start up” times are unwilling to change how things are done when companies grow up. A company with 500+ employees is not a startup, stop playing that card, it'll be your Achilles heel. HR leadership is erratic, immature, and flighty. Sales leadership is manipulative, disrespectful and chaotic. Ops are difficult to work with, Product team could care less what the customers want, CS has immature management without experience outside of the company, and Support leaders can't seem to stay longer than a year. You could have a great team but the exec team will create a constant state of change and choas that any resemblance of culture this place had was gone in January.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur PandaDoc

5,0
8 août 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

great company, growing very quickly

Inconvénients

limited paid time off to enjoy traditional life

3
1,0
10 juin 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

decently nice coworkers. Internet paid for?

Inconvénients

Where to begin? Pandadoc is directionless. The company creates revenue because the product is fairly simple and low-cost. And yet, there’s no product roadmap in sight to expand revenue into new markets or geos. Most directors and above are acting within the “peter principle” and shift blame and accountability to lowly ICs. I’ve never seen anything like it in my career. Said “leadership” can’t create a sticky strategy if their jobs depended on it—oh wait! That’s why they scapegoat ICs! Easier to blame an IC2 than take responsibility for their poor choices or no choices for that matter. There’s no top-down planning anywhere at this company. And because there’s no planning, everyone at the bottom has to compensate for the lack of direction and prioritization. That has led to burnout, attrition and the lowest morale I’ve seen at a tech company since 2020. The company has zero career laddering, departments go years without promoting a single team member, but the CEOs inner circle get promotions every year. I’ve never seen a strategy from marketing or sales. Ask an AE how many times Pd has tried to pivot markets or segments!

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout