employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Failing Up - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) International Rescue Committee

1,0
4 avr. 2024
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great Mission. The direct service staff have huge hearts. If this office was funded based on empathy, they would be billionaires.

Inconvénients

The only way to succeed is to fail up. 90% of the work is done by the entry level employees because the important leadership positions are currently occupied by people who struggle to manage their own workloads, do poor in their roles, and are promoted into supervisory roles in order to hire someone more administratively competent for the role they've failed to master. The number of bottlenecks in this office range between 100-1000, with new bottlenecks being created everyday by management who micro-manage their staff poorly, have frequent amnesia, and overall a difficulty grasping any sort of reality to what is actually going on with the staff providing direct service. Senior leadership has been 'reviewing' a Diversity/Racism steps to implement into the office for over 3 years now and it shows because nothing in that area has improved one bit.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur International Rescue Committee

5,0
24 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Inconvénients

None that I can think of.

2,0
22 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Inconvénients

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout