employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Intentional Software

Fait partie de Microsoft

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Intentional is loads of fun if you're a go-getter. - Avis employé Software Development Intern Intentional Software

5,0
19 févr. 2016
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great people, very "startup" environment, free snacks, lots of room for advancement and ideas. There's no heirarchy, you could literally walk into the CEO's office at any time.

Inconvénients

Weird platform that a lot of people had a hard time getting used to. If you're not able to think on your feet you won't be able to handle it. It felt like the bad interns got just as much as the good ones, the system doesn't reward hard work or success.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Intentional Software

5,0
22 juil. 2020
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent pay, chill coworkers, cutting edge tech, good snacks

Inconvénients

Confusing product, lack of team structure

1,0
7 mai 2016
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Core technology is legitimately innovative and very well-made. They really do have a unique and better way of writing software. Their platform could really be a really huge deal, if it is ever finished, polished, and released.

Inconvénients

Wages are grossly non-competitive. As a relatively senior developer there I made significantly less than a fresh-out-of-college no-experience developer would make at other companies. 10+ years and they have not produced a product. Management is entirely deaf to complaints of any kind. Senior developers have a history of dramatically rage-quitting during meetings with management. (Seriously, one or two is maybe a fluke, but four or five is evidence of really serious management problems!) Significant trouble attracting and retaining quality talent. Platform is poorly documented and hard to use, because management can't seem to keep talented enough developers around long enough to do that. Charles (the owner/CTO) is impossible to work with, and does not act on any feedback of any kind. No meaningful quality control or review processes, developers are not properly supervised and spend large amounts of time working on code that is thrown away. No meaningful planning or design was done for the product. No coordination between teams existed. Developers are regularly kept in the dark about important details, like what the product they were developing actually is and when deadlines are. Developers with very little experience (sometimes nearly straight out of school) and with no demonstrated leadership or technical ability are promoted to management / lead positions.

7
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout