Protect your own mental health and GO - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Spring Health

2,0
9 déc. 2020
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The mission statement is what got me hooked. Eliminating every barrier to mental health? YES. There are some genuine people that really care about making an impact in this field. They work hard and they're kind.

Inconvénients

BUT what good is this mission statement when the people at the top struggle with basic communication and have no sense of empathy? Burnt out employees, tension among teams, passive aggressive behavior-it’s the last thing you would expect from a mental-health startup- and yet, that was the reality I faced everyday at work. Where is the "passion" for mental health and why isn’t it being practiced internally? I would have never predicted that a series of negative encounters with executives would weigh so heavily against my values that I felt so out of alignment and morally could not continue. Also, on the surface it seemed they wanted to create a more diverse executive team but in hindsight it’s become clear to me that it was more for show than to effect any actual change in the company. Words mean nothing without action behind it. The culture seemed warm and inviting in the beginning but it doesn't take long for consistency to prevail in the more negative aspects. Run away from this fast and take your desire to help the mental health field to a company that actually practices what they preach.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Spring Health

5,0
9 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I received payment on time.

Inconvénients

No cons. Just moved on.

3,0
17 juin 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The company's products help people in meaningful ways

Inconvénients

Company is very poorly misled. There isn't a real vision or culture. In general, ways of working here are scattered and immature. We have a new SDLC every 10 months or so. Constant re-orgs and changes in leadership cause instability. Teams and ICs are re-allocated every 3–6 months. Priorities are constantly shifting. "Science will win" except when it comes to evaluating AI's place in our product. Sudden AI focus despite not having a real vision for how it aligns with our mission. Leaders who report directly to the CEO often cycle out every year or so. There seems to be very little awareness or ownership that leaders aren't set up for success. The company says it cares about employee "thriving" but promotes leaders with very poor scores. It seems to be more of a vanity metric/tool to fire people.

6
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout