Declined to proceed after initial recruiter conversation. Process concerns: - Recruiter unable to confirm level/seniority before committing to multi-round interview process - Interview includes 60-minute LeetCode-style coding round for senior ML roles - Project presentation required specific template/format, suggesting standardized evaluation not calibrated for senior candidates - Expected 4+ hours of interview time plus project prep without clarity on role scope For senior ML candidates with research publications and production experience, LeetCode assessments and templated presentations suggest the process is optimized for mid-level engineers rather than evaluating senior judgment, system design, and research capabilities. Pros: Interesting product Cons: Unclear leveling, LeetCode for senior roles, time-intensive process without upfront clarity, junior-oriented evaluation structure

There were two main rounds of interviews - Virtual Onsite 1 and Virtual Onsite 2. Virtual Onsite 1 had a problem solving task which is basically a live interactive coding round. The second round was Project review round where you talk about some project you worked on and some follow up questions on that during presentation.