Recruiter Screen followed by Technical rounds followed by an onsite. The behavior rounds mainly focussed on the depth and leadership. The coding rounds were Leetcode medium and the System Design is low-level.

The interview was fairly standard although the answer a Leetcode style question has largely fallen out of favour in favour of more realistic scenarios so I was surprised that this was used as part of the technical interview. The main stumbling block for me was the enforcement of HackerRank as the interface for the interview. The lack of a debugger, test suite, whiteboard, scratchpad, intellisense meant that I was restricted to essentially using Notepad to write a solution. This majorly disadvantages people who are visual thinkers and need a tool to represent problems using diagrams. This use of HackerRank applied to both the coding test and the system design test which was fairly surprising. Typically a whiteboard is seen as an essential tool for system design. Overall my experience was positive, but the choice of tools severly limited my ability to communicate and plan my problem solving approach. A suggestion to the recruitment team would be to ditch Hackerrank in favour of something that represents a more realistic development environment or at least allow the use of a whiteboard. Another suggestion would be to avoid asking questions around US specific services or products. A good deal of the system design time was spent trying to understand how the product worked and trying to reconcile US finance regulations vs UK finance regulations rather than actually designing anything. UK regulations are much stricter than US, particularly around custody of client assets, hence the need for a more complex system.