Siloed politics and lack of leadership negates potential for greatness - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Inlogik

2,0
31 janv. 2019
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Flexible work hours and casual work atmosphere for developers and other streams alike. Potentially solid fintech technology platform (if nurtured properly).

Inconvénients

- Pay is well below industry standard - Management is too busy protecting their siloes to see the bigger picture - You've heard of Traditional, Agile, and Hybrid Project Delivery - Inlogik goes one better and embraces 'Chaos.' - Executive Management is clueless - Too much of tacit knowledge held by individuals for political leverage

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Inlogik

5,0
13 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great company to work for. A lot of staff have been around for 10-20yrs which shows how well the company treats them.

Inconvénients

Need for some outside thinking.

1,0
2 août 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Some supportive colleagues who are generous with knowledge sharing. Opportunity to work on a live production mobile app using modern tools and libraries. Leadership is willing to listen to concerns when escalated appropriately.

Inconvénients

Unrealistic expectations placed on “learning tasks” — assignments given to onboard new hires with complex patterns like CQRS were later judged as if they were production-ready work, with little tolerance for mistakes. Limited variety in task allocation during probation, with a focus on minor defect fixes and backlog grooming rather than meaningful feature work. Probation feedback focused more on output rather than potential, despite limited exposure and ramp-up time. Communication feedback lacked clarity and felt more like personality-based preferences (e.g., preferring short “yes” responses over thoughtful, contextual dialogue). A strong culture of conformity — there’s an unspoken expectation to be a “yes person” rather than challenge decisions or offer alternative ideas. Pockets of favoritism and dismissive behavior among team members that negatively affect collaboration and inclusion. Resistance to change and modern practices in parts of the codebase and architecture, despite the appearance of innovation.

3
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout